help button home button
AJRCMB
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published ahead of print on August 21, 2008
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, doi:10.1165/rcmb.2007-0367OC
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Churg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J. L
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Churg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J. L

Submitted on October 8, 2007
Revised on August 20, 2008

Expression of Profibrotic Mediators in Small Airways vs Parenchyma after Cigarette Smoke Exposure

Andrew Churg1*, Steven Zhou1, Olena Preobrazhenska1, Hsin Tai1, Rona Wang1, and Joanne L Wright1

1 Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: achurg{at}interchange.ubc.ca.

Cigarette smoke-induced lung disease presents a morphologic contradiction in that the small airways become fibrotic but the parenchyma becomes emphysematous over time. To examine the mechanisms behind these phenomena we exposed mice to cigarette smoke for up to 6 months and isolated small airways from histologic sections by laser capture microdissection. We then removed residual airway tissue and vessels, and collected the remaining parenchymal tissue. Gene expression of 13 fibrogenic growth/signaling factors (particularly TGF{beta}-related genes), matrix proteins, or enzymes involved in matrix production was examined by real-time RT-PCR. Combining present and previously published data from our laboratory, in the airways over the long term there was a sustained and marked increase in expression of almost all of these genes. By contrast, in the parenchyma, expression of most genes was elevated at 2 and 24 hours after initial exposure and all were elevated at 1 month, but by 6 months, when emphysema was present, most genes (9/13) were either at control values or downregulated below control. At 3 months several genes that were considerably elevated at 1 month were back to control levels, suggesting that loss of the parenchymal response precedes the development of emphysema. We conclude that with smoke exposure the airways demonstrate an ongoing profibrotic/proelastogenic response and the parenchyma a generally anti-fibrotic/anti-elastogenic response, but one that develops only with long term exposure to smoke. These observations support the idea that the parenchyma largely fails to repair smoke-induced matrix damage, but this phenomenon is a relatively late event.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
Copyright © 2008 American Thoracic Society.
  ATS Best of the Web